Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sjlver's avatar

> Zion Lights - Organic Farming Activism threatens millions - and the environment

I initially found this article thought-provoking. After discussing it with others, I find that it is rather biased towards the author's ideology, to the point of being misleading.

First the good points: The article praises the green revolution, and how it led to substantial yield increases particularly in developing countries. The article also accurately reports that Sri Lanka banned chemical fertilizer imports in 2021, and had its worst economic crisis yet in 2022.

The misleading or incomplete points: The article oversimplifies the cause of Sri Lanka's economic collapse by attributing it primarily to the fertilizer ban. It fails to mention other crucial factors, such as COVID-19, pre-existing foreign debt problems, poor fiscal management, impact of the Ukraine war on global food and fuel prices, etc. The article creates a semblance of causality which does not withstand scrutiny.

While the article makes valid points about land-use efficiency, it presents a somewhat false dichotomy between conventional and organic agriculture. It oversimplifies organic farming and does not take into account the challenges facing developing countries in agricultural modernization. It does not mention that the climate disasters that contribute to Sri Lanka's crisis are also linked to overly intensive agriculture and industry.

I also want to mention the article's origin. I admit this is a bit of an ad-hominem attack, but given how controversial the source is, it's important to be aware. HumanProgress.org is a project of the Cato Institute with major support from the John Templeton Foundation and the Searle Freedom Trust (see https://humanprogress.org/about/). The Cato Institute belongs to Charles G. Koch, a US billionaire who got rich with (among other things) fertilizer production. Both the Cato Institute and John Templeton Foundation are involved in climate change denial activism.

Maybe future editions of this newsletter could do a bit more fact-checking and a slightly more careful selection of articles ;-) Anyway, thank you for the pointers and the good discussions and thoughts that followed my reading of them.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts